{"id":292,"date":"2023-01-17T17:09:27","date_gmt":"2023-01-17T23:09:27","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/defendtexit.com\/texas-ag-ken-paxton-files-amicus-brief-on-tnm-v-facebook-lawsuit\/"},"modified":"2023-01-17T17:09:27","modified_gmt":"2023-01-17T23:09:27","slug":"texas-ag-ken-paxton-files-amicus-brief-on-tnm-v-facebook-lawsuit","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/defendtexit.com\/texas-ag-ken-paxton-files-amicus-brief-on-tnm-v-facebook-lawsuit\/","title":{"rendered":"Texas AG Ken Paxton Files Amicus Brief On TNM v. Facebook Lawsuit"},"content":{"rendered":"
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton has filed an amicus brief in the TNM vs. Meta lawsuit<\/strong><\/a> that has challenged Facebook\u2019s ability to censor Texans. The lawsuit has not only caused Meta to stop censoring<\/strong><\/a> The Texas Nationalist Movement, but it has shaken big tech lawyers and will likely hold social media giants to Texas HB 20, which forbids social media giants from censoring Texans.\u00a0<\/p>\n Attorney General Paxton\u2019s amicus brief was deeply critical of Meta\u2019s requests, is complimentary of TNM\u2019s lawsuit, and seeks to uphold Texas\u2019 H.B. 20:\u00a0<\/p>\n Texas passed HB 20 after numerous examples came to light where Facebook and other large social media platforms were shown to discriminate against users based on their users\u2019 viewpoints. <\/em>Texas determined that this behavior rose to the level that it implicated the State\u2019s \u201cfundamental interest in protecting the free exchange of ideas and information\u201d within its borders.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n Facebook likely had no basis to remove this suit to federal court. There is definitively no federal question jurisdiction because Plaintiffs\u2019 suit arises under HB 20\u2014a state-law cause of action.<\/em><\/p>\n California\u2014as expressed through multiple recent, high-profile enactments\u2014has propounded policy goals at loggerheads with HB 20. Among other things, California penalizes certain viewpoints that contradict state edicts. <\/em><\/p>\n In light of California public policy, there is a significant possibility that a California court applying California law would refuse or water-down HB 20\u2019s enforcement.\u00a0<\/em><\/p>\n